Every year, businesses lose millions to payment fraud and data breaches, as business-to-business (B2B) transactions are increasingly targeted by cybercriminals. Latin America suffers the highest revenue loss to fraud globally at 20%. This means, on average, for every $100 of revenue earned by Latin American businesses, $20 is lost to fraud – a rate far higher than in North America or Asia-Pacific.
With digital payment fraud continuing to rise as businesses expand their online payment networks, choosing the right security solution is critical. However, many businesses can find it hard to make this decision due to the technical jargon surrounding solutions like encryption and tokenisation.
While both technologies protect sensitive payment data, they work in fundamentally different ways and serve different business needs. It’s important for business leaders to understand the differences as organisations across different verticals face different payment security challenges. For example, a tourism company processing thousands of international bookings per day has different needs than a manufacturing firm making high-value supplier payments.
This article cuts through the complexity, explaining the difference between the two solutions. This includes which industries and use cases they are most applicable to, and how different vertical businesses can make the right decision as to whether they should implement tokenisation, encryption, or both.